I hesitate to respond again, but I feel that I must do so. It was charged that I made assumptions about the mud, or that I only went to level 2 and then quit. However, it has been assumptions about my remarks which are in error. I commented about my experience, to which people replied that it must have been because of something I have done. Could I not have merely had a bad experience? Or is it such that anyone who does not enjoy RoD as much as you must not have been really trying? Or that they did not give it a fair shot?
I did advance beyond level 2. I just made a commment about what happened while I was at level 2. You assumed that was as far as I had leveled.
Again, I offered that I am sure that RoD is a very competent MUD, as evidenced by the number of people that play it. But, as this is a section for reviews, I feel I am well within my rights to explain how I feel about my experience of RoD. You may apologize and make excuses for RoD if you wish, but I will appreciate it if you refrain from assuming any more about my actions. I have been mudding for 5 years and building for 3 and am quite competent when it comes to understanding how a MUD works.