|
|||||||
This is a discussion on "What OLC do you prefer adding code support for?" in the Top Mud Sites MUD Coding forum : Just wondering what everyones opinions are as for as which version of olc they prefer to support.... |
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our MUD community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you are a registered member of the old TMS forums, please click here
|
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
06-04-2002, 12:01 AM
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 17
    |
Just wondering what everyones opinions are as for as which version of olc they prefer to support.
|
|
    
|
|
06-10-2002, 03:37 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 117
 |
OLC is evil.
|
|
|
|
|
06-15-2002, 09:11 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-15-2002, 09:48 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: #### Paso, Tx
Posts: 89
|
What are the versions? Which stock codebases can they be added to? I wasn't aware there were more than one choice for any particular codebase...
If I remember correctly, Ivan's OLC was for ROM, and Oasis was for Circle. Has this changed? Are they now a megacode which works on any? Where do I evaluate the features each has, and are there any comparison and contrasts between them? Traditionally, the higher version numbers represent better program output, with the notable exception of Zmud, which ceased to be worthwhile after 4.62... This is usually because the users of said program provide input and feedback to the programmer(s), who in turn focus their product on that feedback, creating something more user-desired in the next outbreak. I'm gathering from the "YAY" by 1.81 that the same is true for this OLC...? At any rate, I prefer the OLC we use, which began at some point in the past as whatever OLC it was that went into ROM. I do believe that Oasis' menu-driven system (IIRC) has some merit, as well. |
|
|
|
|
06-28-2002, 10:40 PM
|
#5 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 10
|
Rom24 Olc 1.81 is by far the best out of all that ivan has made, it has the least amount of bugs, and is the most commonly used in the Rom community. It also has the most technical support behind it, and the most snippets/bug fixes for it.
Not to mention its the most secure. But thats just my 2cents.. Anyways, good post ostoles... C-ya on the darkside. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
What OLC do you prefer adding code support for? - Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adding Affects | Haley | MUD Builders and Areas | 2 | 10-06-2003 10:04 AM |
| Do you prefer permadeath in a RP MUD? | OnyxFlame | Tavern of the Blue Hand | 39 | 10-06-2003 12:44 AM |
| Mysql support | the_logos | MUD Coding | 2 | 03-27-2003 02:28 PM |
| Adding new areas | Kariyana | MUD Coding | 1 | 01-18-2003 12:12 AM |
| Adding new zones | Danlor | MUD Coding | 3 | 08-27-2002 09:18 AM |
|
|
