Re: Revolutionary New OLC and Scripting
You cannot assume at all, only report the verifiable facts. That is what the article attempts to do - it reports the facts which have evidence to back them up. Now personally I dislike many of Wikipedia's policies about references, but even I agree that there should be something a bit more substantial than one guy's memories of something that happened 15 years ago.
Sure, but the article discusses the release date, not the copyright date.
I've denied it because it never happened. What possible motive could I have for lying about it?
|