|
grant the license to the owner. the owner is an ascertainable person and therefore is primarily responsible for conforming to the agreement. You say "non-exclusive." Don't you mean exclusive? In that the builder will only grant the area to that particular owner? Otherwise, if non-exclusive, it seems to suggest the builder can give the area to many people. also, who's right is non-revokable? if the license is provided without consideration it is not a promise and is therefore very revokable. maybe a better formulation would be:
BUILDER grants to OWNER a right to use this work for the MUD known as (MUDNAME). OWNER shall have the right to modify said work to conform with the MUD. OWNER shall not have the right to transfer said work to any other MUD other than the one indicated above without the express permission of the BUILDER.
This is a good starting point. after this, i suppose you could throw in whatever clauses you want. however, try not to get too confusing and make sure you are consistent with builders, owners, and muds.
if you have any questions, or would like any further help, let me know.
|