|
Actually you're quite wrong. Judges and juries are encouraged to put aside their personal opinions and make deicisions based on known facts. Some people can't look past their own opinions and be completely unbiased like the job requires - this is why we have jury selection with the option to refuse certain biased people. This is also why there's such a scrutinizing process to becoming a judge, with even the slightest slip up ruining your chances.
In this case, you are the biased potential juror, and would never be given a seat on the jury.
That's a discussion to be had with administration, not the public. If you were indeed that concerned with such information potentially being used again, then simple logic dictates that you would have made it a point -NOT- to share it with the general public and instead given it directly to the administration via personal email.
However, that was quite obviously not your motivation. You were shooting for a "haha, see I told you so" in front of as many people as possible, and now that you're being called on it you're backpedaling and trying to come up with an excuse that just doesn't fly.
|