|
Obviously - just as I believe you are wrong - otherwise we wouldn't be discussing this.
I am pointing out the intent of the Diku license, and showing how the license could be interpretted that way. I am also saying that until tested in a court of law, there is no way to know which interpretation is correct - and regardless of how you like it, that is the way the law works. You cannot simply decide that you prefer your own interpretation of a license! Even Tyche and kaylus1 agree that the license will most likely be interpetted as "for non-commercial use only", which was the main part of my original post which you replied to.
|