|
I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt that you previously misunderstood those links, because anyone who did understand their content would logically conclude that Medievia is a DIKU derivative, as per US law as cited.
Elsewhere on these boards you have claimed that Medievia was not a derviative because you've made many changes to the DIKU codebase, but the definition clearly shows that such a claim is insufficient, and that you are still a DIKU derivative and subject to their license. Also, that you owe the authors public recognition via the 'credits' command (as required by the license you are thusly bound by), and should cease referring to Medievia's code as an original work.
Are you willing to publically concede that you and your husband are guilty of plagiarism, Soleil? (You may not feel it's very important, but owning up to that much would be a nice start.) If not, could you explain how what you are doing is not plagiarism?
|