Topic starts good on page one, catches my interest, makes me think about 'bragvertising'.
Topic very quickly and... Not unexpectedly becomes a series of heated arguments over wording, and how stupid the other poster is. Without warning, my mind wanders, and I am now thinking about cream-filled pastries.
I don't think policing mud claims is practical, but it does hurt when some mud is falsely claiming something and you can't do anything to correct them. The best correction would be a timeline or rating system impartially done by someone like TMS, to which mudders could refer instead of the advertisement claims made to draw newbies.
|