|
Um, no. How you managed to conclude that I used that to base my opinion is beyond me. I used the wording of the license itself to reiterate what the license said. My "opinion" - is that it's a silly discussion on both ends of the spectrum, that people without a legal background arguing legal semantics is a lesson in futility - unless you happen to be one of us wee moronic dweebs who happen to get a kick out of watching the spiral.
I was re-stating, in my own words, my understanding of what the license said. I never gave my opinion on whether or not I agreed with it, so again, I have no idea where you came up with that ridiculous notion.
|