Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post

Rathik · 12-26-2005, 03:45 AM

A person's concept of quality is based on their preference. I think popularity is a very good indicator of how good a mud is. It's been stated a million times on these forums... everyone has different preferences of what they look for in a mud. If a mud has a lot of votes, generally they have a lot of players. And if you have a lot of players, then a lot more people like that mud, and the chances of new mudders or experienced mudders liking that mud are a lot higher, if you follow me.

Every mud will claim to be the best; it's a shame they all can't fit on page 1. TMS might as well show a random 20 each week on page 1.

I'm not against an objective rating system; however, I do consider it to be impossible and pointless to argue for it.

12-26-2005, 03:45 AM	#31
Rathik Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Arizona Posts: 35	A person's concept of quality is based on their preference. I think popularity is a very good indicator of how good a mud is. It's been stated a million times on these forums... everyone has different preferences of what they look for in a mud. If a mud has a lot of votes, generally they have a lot of players. And if you have a lot of players, then a lot more people like that mud, and the chances of new mudders or experienced mudders liking that mud are a lot higher, if you follow me. Every mud will claim to be the best; it's a shame they all can't fit on page 1. TMS might as well show a random 20 each week on page 1. I'm not against an objective rating system; however, I do consider it to be impossible and pointless to argue for it.