Sure. Win-win for the p2p games listed on the main page. Beyond that, not really. They gained one player from a p2p.
I fall to the feet of the p2p games for providing one player to the other games. But, let us consider for a moment. Had those games not been there, they would likely be getting more hits.
This is one of the reasons I am so much in favor of the p2p games (in ANY form) being marked with a clickable $ symbol that notes they take payments, or are mandatory p2p. This way, those of us who run non-p2p MUDs (not me, mine isn't even listed here ... so for those who want to say I'm being bitter, grow up and get some bubble gum), have a better chance of getting some of those who bypass p2p MUDs entirely simply on principle. If you want more information, go see the poll about this in the other forum. It covers all of this.
|