Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post - In defense of all MUDs. Our genre's noteworthiness is being questioned.

Lasher · 01-13-2009, 12:26 PM

If there is a real demand for this I could do it here, but would want to be personally "hands off" on it other than setting it up - would we end up with the same control issues over time?

Would probably use Twiki as that is the one I have the most personal experience with, unless others feel strongly there's a better option?

Incidentally, I own the domain 'mudwiki.com' which was redirected to mu.wikia.com but the domain itself was never used, so reassigning it to something else would do no harm.

We've never had a code repository here and twiki has good handling of attachments so that's another benefit - being able to attach the code to the article covering it.

In terms of data backup, for what it's worth TMS is backed up and ftped off-site nightly.

01-13-2009, 12:26 PM	#181
Lasher Administrator Join Date: May 2005 Name: Derek Location: Orlando Posts: 357	Re: In defense of all MUDs. Our genre's noteworthiness is being questioned. If there is a real demand for this I could do it here, but would want to be personally "hands off" on it other than setting it up - would we end up with the same control issues over time? Would probably use Twiki as that is the one I have the most personal experience with, unless others feel strongly there's a better option? Incidentally, I own the domain 'mudwiki.com' which was redirected to mu.wikia.com but the domain itself was never used, so reassigning it to something else would do no harm. We've never had a code repository here and twiki has good handling of attachments so that's another benefit - being able to attach the code to the article covering it. In terms of data backup, for what it's worth TMS is backed up and ftped off-site nightly.