|
I'm just quoting what you said to avoid repeating it. Kavir understood the analogy quite well and agreed that it is entirely accurate, and he and I rarely agree on anything.. It's weird that some of the others seem to be unable to get their heads around it.
Before anyone else is tempted to ask, for the millionth time, why I'm opposed to a label like, "free to play, pay for perks" go ahead and read the quoted post above.
As I've stated over and over (I seriously don't think some of the posters here actually read the posts before launching into flames), I have no objection to being labeled -fully- and accurately. "pay for perks" is not a sufficient description anymore than "amateur" is a sufficient description for Carrion Fields. That's the last time I repeat myself, as if you can't be bothered to read my posts, stop asking me the question I already answered.
--matt
|