Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post

Delerak · 05-01-2009, 11:00 AM

Why are you surprised there's less than 3 million entries? They are articles that are supposed to have sources and be relatively important information. In context, that's a ****load of pages full of info.

MUD's simply are not important in relation to other information in the encyclopedia.

If we look back to the way encyclopedia's used to be and still are used you'll never find any information on MUDs most likely.

05-01-2009, 11:00 AM	#10
Delerak Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Name: Dan Location: New York Posts: 716	Re: Wikipedia is at it again Why are you surprised there's less than 3 million entries? They are articles that are supposed to have sources and be relatively important information. In context, that's a ****load of pages full of info. MUD's simply are not important in relation to other information in the encyclopedia. If we look back to the way encyclopedia's used to be and still are used you'll never find any information on MUDs most likely.