What everybody is ignoring here is the simple fact:
The implementor is the one paying for the game.
He (Or she) is the one who created the game.
Without him, there can be no game.
So I think the imp has every reason in the world to be able to be a "dictator", because the players can't run the game they play at (That would cause lots of horrible things to happen, mainly cheating, or would create a state where the players become the dictators and nobody would play the game).
So what if the imp is a dictator? It's his game, he's paying for it, he made it...
|