|
I voted against, simply because I don't think it makes sense to list the muds that are only half-way down the list. I think it would also create some odd voting results, because people are more likely to vote for (by clicking on, to take a look) those muds which are listed on the front screen - but as those entries scrolled upwards, the ones above them would come down, and in turn get more votes.
I've nothing against giving the smaller muds more publicity, I just don't think your proposal is the right way to do it - just my opinion, but that's why I voted "no".
|