Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post - In defense of all MUDs. Our genre's noteworthiness is being questioned.

scandum · 08-10-2010, 05:03 PM

I see where you're going, but why waste time keeping 20 to 40 MUDs on Wikipedia that don't meet the notability requirements because they don't have reliable secondary sources if you can create articles based on primary sources on Mudpedia?

08-10-2010, 05:03 PM	#228
scandum Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 315	Re: In defense of all MUDs. Our genre's noteworthiness is being questioned. I see where you're going, but why waste time keeping 20 to 40 MUDs on Wikipedia that don't meet the notability requirements because they don't have reliable secondary sources if you can create articles based on primary sources on Mudpedia?