Re: In defense of all MUDs. Our genre's noteworthiness is being questioned.
Wikipedia editor here.
In mid Dec there was a comment on the discussion page of the article with the title "Consider for deletion?". Since that was made, there were not many attempts to improve the article (aside from the people who AfD'd this page). I think this is the root of the problem, not all this "Wikipedia is biased about so and so" stuff (although Wikipedia does have its problems).
If the article had been fixed up to include non-dead sources and the like, it probably would not be AfD'd as it is right now.
|