Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post

nass · 07-07-2002, 01:25 PM

I have to say that I prefer TMCs way of doing things, allowing comments. Some of the reviews of my mud have been shockingly far from the truth, either by people with a chip on their shoulder or by people froma 'rival' mud. Now there's nothing wrong with people saying "I don't like <yadda>, I think it'd be better done in <yadda> way. Fair enough, that's your opinion. But when people write plain old mistruths, that's a different matter. Now I appreciate that the moderator here has made some effort to try and regulate reviews. But that, in and of itself, is problematic, for obvious "free speech" reasons. So my vote would be for allowing the registered admin user here on the sustem for whatever mud is being reviewed just chance at a reply. Ie not make it into a flamefest, but allow them to put their side of the argument.

07-07-2002, 01:25 PM	#20
nass Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 128	I have to say that I prefer TMCs way of doing things, allowing comments. Some of the reviews of my mud have been shockingly far from the truth, either by people with a chip on their shoulder or by people froma 'rival' mud. Now there's nothing wrong with people saying "I don't like <yadda>, I think it'd be better done in <yadda> way. Fair enough, that's your opinion. But when people write plain old mistruths, that's a different matter. Now I appreciate that the moderator here has made some effort to try and regulate reviews. But that, in and of itself, is problematic, for obvious "free speech" reasons. So my vote would be for allowing the registered admin user here on the sustem for whatever mud is being reviewed just chance at a reply. Ie not make it into a flamefest, but allow them to put their side of the argument.