I don't disagree with that in theory. If a reviewer posts something along the lines of: GenmaC has no clue what makes MUD X tick, we R00lz., then, yes, it should be disallowed.
But what if someone posts a positive review that, without taking the reviewer to task, addresses the negative points raised by the reviewer in an attempt to offer their own positive opinion of MUD X. It never once criticizes the reviewer, but absolutely defends MUD X in response to the bad review.
The easiest out here might be to whack reviews that are clearly personal attacks against the reviewer. But what about reviews that are clearly personal attakcs against the reviewee?
|