View Single Post
Old 03-07-2011, 10:32 PM   #7
scandum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 315
scandum will become famous soon enough
Re: The inevitability of GUIs in text-based mudding

One important aspect to consider is that a graphical interface is often a tactical interface. A tactical interface gives a player a huge advantage, so the question is not so much if the players use a tactical interface because they really want it, or because they feel forced (or tempted) to use it in order to compete.

I should point out that a skilled scripter can create a powerful tactical interface for any mud, the most obvious, easiest, and (arguably) most advantageous, fully client side tactical interface would be zmud's automapper.

I think MUDs could benefit from non tactical graphical interfaces, though I question the advantage of tactical interfaces as it increases the gap between blind and sighted players.

I think better physics handling and dynamic description generation are areas where MUDs can outperform graphical games, while all the interfaces I've seen are poor imitations of the graphical genre.
scandum is offline   Reply With Quote