Why do you lump the alleged practices of Achaea in with MU*s being able to advertise for themselves?
I know for a fact that many muds (including the one I build for) can only afford their hosting fees. ANY advertising, mention, objective review, or even a pat on the back the way Brody is doing in pointing out the people who deserve a second look is much appreciated by those of us who may never again see the Top 20. I also applaud Brody. He makes no judgment on the MU*s he lists, he simply points out a couple interesting features. Any who are interested can go and form their own opinions.
And any mud which places a link here and expects privacy is seriously in need of common sense. If someone gives them a fair, and objective, critical review, would that be offencive as well?
--QS
|