[Threshold]

How is it confusing? Don't just throw out words with negative connotations without explaining HOW it is confusing.

A pay for perks mud would choose the first option, and absolutely anyone who was looking for a pay for perks mud would know to choose the first option for their search. Would they then have to narrow their search down by READING the text box? Yes they would. But we are talking about muds here. So what if a tiny bit of additional reading is involved. At least the search options themselves were kept accurate.

There is absolutely nothing confusing about that whatsoever.

It isn't vague whatsoever. Inclusiveness does not equal vagueness. My two options are the opposite of vague: they are explicit, specific, and accurate.

The gap between two different payment systems is nothing compared to the gap between accepting money in some form and not accepting money in any form. That is the true gap that really makes the most critical difference. My options actually clearly differentiate between those two realities. All the other sets of options don't.

Also, there is no such thing as 4-5 binary options. If it is binary, there are 2 options. Come on man, you work with computers you know that.

What is the problem here? Why are you so against a set of options that is actually accurate, and does not CREATE ways for someone to game the system?

The suggestions that have more than 2 options create a whole new set of problems and inaccuracies. Whether or not money EVER changes hands for ANY reasons is the only issue that can be factually stated.