|
<Moderator edited something out here.>
I am not personally attacking KaVir. I am calling into question his credibility to make the kind of absolute, "There's No Way I am Wrong" legal analysis he makes. Since he has no legal training, he really needs to tone down the absolutism of his blather.
Look at Shane for example. He's doing the same kind of research and linking, and yet he is fully open to the possibility he is misinterpreting things since he has no legal training. He's a good example of a layperson discussing a legal matter with an appropriate degree of caution and self-doubt. KaVir could really learn from his example.
<Moderator edited out some more stuff>.
|