|
That's nice.
Too bad its no substitute for actual legal training.
10 years of posting red faced rants and searching the internet is worth about as much as a Sally Struthers paralegal correspondence course.
Again, the point isn't that he shouldn't be engaging in legal analysis. That's fine. There's nothing wrong with that. People do that sort of thing every day on every subject.
The point is that he shouldn't be making such absolute declarations as if he is DEFINITELY right and everyone else is definitely wrong.
I might enjoy a discussion of quantum physics, but I sure as heck wouldn't declare everyone else to be DEFINITELY wrong when I lack any formal education but have a few google searches to back up my point.
|