|
Re: Decision tree
I agree with Galleus... All research projects have to have some sort of hypothesis to start with... and a lot of times its proven inconclusive by the evidence, or proven correct, However, this is why we have a peer reviewal process to ferret out those things that may make a project biased. It happens more often than one would expect that a paper is retracted or resubmitted to Science or NAture journals etc where a critical flaw has been revealed by another researcher that changes the findings.
Getting defunct listings from mudconnector would be a great way to increase the accuracy of the data, its important to get those failed stats in there too.
|