Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post

Jazuela · 05-08-2009, 07:23 PM

That would make zero sense. If it's "open" PK, then the people who choose that option, would be allowed to PK anyone. Which would probably **** off the no PK people and the RP PK people. If the RPK means roleplay PK, then they would be allowed to PK anyone as long as there's RP involved, or a RP'ed IC reason..which would **** off the no-PK people. If the NPK is no-PK, then they would not be allowed to kill anyone, even if they had a very good reason to do so (such as, defending themselves from someone who is PKing them because the other person has picked open-pk).

I mean unless these people are isolated in their own zones, and -cannot- switch between zones, I'm feeling there's something lost in the translation. Assuming that's what all these acronyms mean.

05-08-2009, 07:23 PM	#7
Jazuela Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: New England Posts: 849	Re: Wow this MUD is AMAZING!!!! That would make zero sense. If it's "open" PK, then the people who choose that option, would be allowed to PK anyone. Which would probably ** off the no PK people and the RP PK people. If the RPK means roleplay PK, then they would be allowed to PK anyone as long as there's RP involved, or a RP'ed IC reason..which would ** off the no-PK people. If the NPK is no-PK, then they would not be allowed to kill anyone, even if they had a very good reason to do so (such as, defending themselves from someone who is PKing them because the other person has picked open-pk). I mean unless these people are isolated in their own zones, and -cannot- switch between zones, I'm feeling there's something lost in the translation. Assuming that's what all these acronyms mean.