This is the logic you use to take issue with P2P muds here:
1) They run a P2P mud and,
2) They can afford to pay for advertising and,
3) They occupy a slot in the list therefore,
You take issue with their listing.
However, if I change but one portion of the equation:
1) I run a free mud and,
2) I can AFFORD to pay advertising and,
3) I occupied a slot in the list therefore,
Do you take issue with my listing?
If you would take issue with my listing, then your standards aren't practically applicable: We wouldn't be able to differentiate between those who can really afford to purchase advertisements and those who are genuinely strapped for cash.
If you would not take issue with my listing, then this point is irrelevant and your main issue is thus unjustified -- unless you provide some more explanation. In this case, we would want to know what attribute of P2P muds justifies the thing you take issue with.
Why do you believe that free muds are somehow entitled to free advertising?
|