Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post

Delerak · 05-01-2009, 10:18 PM

I wouldn't put too much weight on a business man's word.

Is this the company you're referring to?

Ironically on wikipedia.

Also

I cannot find an actual website for the company at all, and asides from their commercial muds, even if they do bring in 2 mill a year, it doesn't mean anything to an encyclopedic page. Just because a game has been around for years doesn't mean it has any significance or relevance to an encyclopedia.

Until MUDs have a serious significance, which they never will, they won't be taken seriously by mainstream media.

They will always be underground.

05-01-2009, 10:18 PM	#13
Delerak Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Name: Dan Location: New York Posts: 716	Re: Wikipedia is at it again I wouldn't put too much weight on a business man's word. Is this the company you're referring to? Ironically on wikipedia. Also I cannot find an actual website for the company at all, and asides from their commercial muds, even if they do bring in 2 mill a year, it doesn't mean anything to an encyclopedic page. Just because a game has been around for years doesn't mean it has any significance or relevance to an encyclopedia. Until MUDs have a serious significance, which they never will, they won't be taken seriously by mainstream media. They will always be underground.