[Orrin]

No, no. You're wrong. So there.
It's impolite to assume that someone who disagrees with you simply hasn't read your argument.
I get why you don't like the way the term RPI is applied to a small subset of roleplaying muds, I really do. There's an implication that only the features and tradition those RPI muds represent can produce a game with intensive roleplaying. I hear you. But that doesn't alter the fact that over the years in the mud community the term has been used to apply to that small subset of roleplaying muds.

If you want to apply the term to any game which features intensive roleplaying then be my guest, but please don't try to pretend that it doesn't apply the way I used it.