|
the_logos Aug. 25 2004,22:44
Umm…
I took the trouble of scrolling back and check. And the way it looks to me is that the post before yours actually did have at least some substance to it, whereas yours contains nothing but exactly the 4-year-old-kid-in-the-playpen type of retort that you seem to be accusing the other poster of.
But since this discussion thread, which I had hoped would be dead by now, seems to have been brought back to life again, I am still extremely curious about one thing:
Why on earth did IRE refund Kimberley, when you seem to have gone to such lengths to protect yourself against any refunds? If she really didn’t have a valid claim, why pay her?
You are the only one who can really answer that question, all the attempts made from your followers and others are just speculations.
So could you please satisfy my curiosity?
|