View Single Post
Old 08-25-2004, 03:48 PM   #87
Rundvelt
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 37
Rundvelt is on a distinguished road
The key to this whole discussion if you read the posts involve "no reason". You will notice that I agreed with you on the issue of Kimberly.

So, maybe there's been a misunderstanding.

So, let me try again. Let's try to read too.

1) A company can be sued for the money a person pays out of pocket for a service or product they denied you without merit.

Now I know you can't possibly deny this.

Now, when it comes down to the "lessons" or whatever the person bought with their credits, the loss is argueable in a court of law. They CAN argue that your agents (Yes, they are your agents because you authorize them to make these descisions), penalized him/her unfairly.

So, to summarise, because you allow the players to make the descisions for your mud, you are responsible for the actions they take. Therefore, if your agents remove items (or whatever) they have purchased without reason, it's the same as if you had.

I don't know if they'll win or not. But I'm know they have a case. Despite what your lawyers say.
Rundvelt is offline   Reply With Quote