|
From what I can see from the quote originally mentioned above, the license is talking about the area file itself. there is no mention of the actual intellectual property of the area, just the area FILE. All arguments before this have related to the IP. How does the area file fit into the copyright? I could make a comment based on previous conversations on the topic, but it would be a comment based on others' opinion. I'd be interesting in seeing a more intelligent response.
Darrik Vequir
-Who realizes a law students opinion is just that, but still wants to hear it.
|