While I disagree with many of the_logos' points, I think his analogy in this case was spot-on. Imagine if there were only two ways listed that a mud could be run: "run by professionals who operate and develop muds for a living" and "run by unskilled amateurs who operate and develop muds as a hobby". Only a few muds would fall into the first category, but I can't see many people willingly listing themselves in the latter.
If such a categorisation were made, I would propose that either (1) it were expanded to take into account other options, or (2) the categorisation be removed entirely.
Unsurprisingly, that's also the exact same proposal I made for the current free/pay-per-play categorisation.
|