Re: Wikipedia is at it again
I wouldn't put too much weight on a business man's word.
Is this the company you're referring to?
Ironically on wikipedia.
Also
I cannot find an actual website for the company at all, and asides from their commercial muds, even if they do bring in 2 mill a year, it doesn't mean anything to an encyclopedic page. Just because a game has been around for years doesn't mean it has any significance or relevance to an encyclopedia.
Until MUDs have a serious significance, which they never will, they won't be taken seriously by mainstream media.
They will always be underground.
|