Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post

The_Disciple · 04-30-2006, 01:41 AM

I strongly doubt that.

For libel, it's not enough to prove that someone wrote falsehoods -- you also need to prove that they knew it.

So you'd need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Kavir knew Medievia wasn't guilty of theft but was alleging it anyway.

Since there's an ass-ton of documentation that Kavir believes what he's alleging, it would be difficult to prove that he doesn't.

04-30-2006, 01:41 AM	#40
The_Disciple Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 113	I strongly doubt that. For libel, it's not enough to prove that someone wrote falsehoods -- you also need to prove that they knew it. So you'd need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Kavir knew Medievia wasn't guilty of theft but was alleging it anyway. Since there's an ass-ton of documentation that Kavir believes what he's alleging, it would be difficult to prove that he doesn't.