I'm not making a veiled attempt at defending the reviewer of your mud with this question, I am just curious.
I understand on a mud, races are generally well defined with a history and stereotypes. However, I was curious if someone were to roleplay consistently and correctly with an in depth character history and logical reasoning of "why", would you allow a sort of "Drizzt-type-char" that goes outside of the normal boundries of what is expected of any given race/class?
|