|
The full reference looks like this:
and was found .
I have to say, having skimmed through the other info on the page, that the use of the particular sentence in question would be if not de minimis then at least fair use. The sentence in the original post fulfills the same criteria:
1. copied portion represents neither substantial nor material part of history
2. is insignificant in value and extent of copyrighted material
3. does not prejudice sale, diminish profits, or supersede objects of original work;
4. copied material has no effect on sale of novel
5. does not relate to theme of history(in copyrighted material)
6. copyright proprietor can not be damaged by use of the sentence.
In short: I agree with KaVir - this is de minimis - or failing that, fair use.
|