|
The point is that (1) Matt requires a huge amount of time investment from the staff (comparible to that of an employee), (2) doesn't pay them anything, and (3) makes a living (and from what he's said in the past, quite a good one) from running a successful commercial mud. But the part I really take exception to is the way he seems to think that his staff are getting a much better deal from it than those staff of other muds.
I place no requirements on the other admin (indeed some of them have yet to make any contributions), nor do I make any money from the mud itself.
I can understand you being angry at me for disproving your arguments on the other thread, but that's no excuse for making equally poor arguments and comparisons on this thread. Why not cut your losses, act like an adult, and treat each thread as a separate issue?
|