Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post - In defense of all MUDs. Our genre's noteworthiness is being questioned.

Delerak · 01-07-2009, 12:12 PM

Did you honestly believe that wikipedia would be the perfect online encyclopedia? So you're saying it's unfair that the site has admins that don't care about your mud or your article? Really?

Pointless knowledge that only matters to a select few people that I can count on both of my hands doesn't count.

Of course I realize how cheap memory is, it was sarcasm. My point was that having an article on Threshold in wikipedia is as pointless as having it anywhere else. Muds have a small cult following of players and that's all they have. This is why it shouldn't matter what wikipedia does to the little articles similar to MUDs or anything else similar to them.

01-07-2009, 12:12 PM	#121
Delerak Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Name: Dan Location: New York Posts: 716	Re: In defense of all MUDs. Our genre's noteworthiness is being questioned. Did you honestly believe that wikipedia would be the perfect online encyclopedia? So you're saying it's unfair that the site has admins that don't care about your mud or your article? Really? Pointless knowledge that only matters to a select few people that I can count on both of my hands doesn't count. Of course I realize how cheap memory is, it was sarcasm. My point was that having an article on Threshold in wikipedia is as pointless as having it anywhere else. Muds have a small cult following of players and that's all they have. This is why it shouldn't matter what wikipedia does to the little articles similar to MUDs or anything else similar to them.