Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post

Crystal · 06-23-2009, 02:03 PM

Well I mainly meant "no better or no worse than each other" as far as quality. A MUD who gives credit vs a MUD who claims all original code are of equal quality in my opinion. I've seen some pretty crappy MUDs with custom codebases, and I've seen some amazing MUDs from a derivative.

I'm against MUD's that don't give proper credit, despite whether or not the license was written perfectly or not. People can interpret licenses many different ways, but common sense dictates that people just want credit for their hard work. And I think people should give it.

06-23-2009, 02:03 PM	#52
Crystal Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Name: Crystal Location: Pennsylvania Home MUD: Advent of the Mists Home MUD: Advent of the Mists Posts: 134	Re: Compliance reminder if your MUD uses OLC Well I mainly meant "no better or no worse than each other" as far as quality. A MUD who gives credit vs a MUD who claims all original code are of equal quality in my opinion. I've seen some pretty crappy MUDs with custom codebases, and I've seen some amazing MUDs from a derivative. I'm against MUD's that don't give proper credit, despite whether or not the license was written perfectly or not. People can interpret licenses many different ways, but common sense dictates that people just want credit for their hard work. And I think people should give it.