|
KaVir:
I have no problem with what you're saying now. But your first post in this thread was simply:
KaVir:
The only reason I can imagine that you would have posted this is because you thought it was relevant to whether the ad we were discussing was an acceptable use of the material.
Specifically, it seemed that you were saying that using a name or phrase was necessarily acceptable because "Copyright does not protect..."
Is that not what you were intending to say? If so, has your position changed? If not, what was the original post in reply to and what were you attempting to point out?
Stilton
|