|
Me:
KaVir:
Well, for starters, you don't seem to have looked at the question part yet- the question asks how you would go about obtaining protection for a name, phrase, etc. The answer, when kept in context with the question, doesn't say what you're representing it to have said. Ok, you could quibble that they could phrase the answer better, but it's an FAQ, not a statute. The rest of us seem to have instantly grasped what it meant.
Mason's cites to the contrary?
Which, if true,doesn't prove that "Spock" and "Kirk" have no protection regarding some uses, as Mason points out.
Giving an example of a case in which protection may not be applicable doesn't disprove the existence of that protection.
Likewise your attempted rebuttal of my "live long and prosper" example.
Stilton
|