[cratylus]

Welp, I made another post that was not only amusing but
illustrated what I thought of the silliness of this position of
yours, but it got deleted. Alas, all I can do is indicate that
I think your position is silly but without the humor.

Oh well.

In any case, I continue to think this is a good idea:

And I think I've amply illustrated that "free" is simply
not sufficiently descriptive. I keep seeing a bunch of verbiage
about things that are not muds and how "free" is defined by
this group or that group, but I think that muds are a very
specific context in which licenses often spell out things
that inform the use of the word "free" with muds.

It is reasonable to expect people of good intention will differ on what
"free mud" means, as we have seen in this very thread, and that alone
is pretty good reason to want things to be more specific.

-Crat