Top Mud Sites Forum - View Single Post - In defense of all MUDs. Our genre's noteworthiness is being questioned.

Samson · 08-13-2010, 04:46 AM

Canvassing. They accuse you of canvassing. Which is what they did when the Threshold article went up for AfD, and during the course of that debate evidence came to light that the wiki admins themselves were using a secret IRC channel to canvass for people to respond to the debate, and those logs were deemed off limits while posts here were being shoved in everyone's face as clear evidence that we were violating the rules.

The whole place is about as corrupt as a corrupt website can get.

08-13-2010, 04:46 AM	#245
Samson Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: United Socialist States of America Home MUD: SmaugMuds.org Home MUD: Arthmoor MUD Hosting Posts: 249	Re: In defense of all MUDs. Our genre's noteworthiness is being questioned. Canvassing. They accuse you of canvassing. Which is what they did when the Threshold article went up for AfD, and during the course of that debate evidence came to light that the wiki admins themselves were using a secret IRC channel to canvass for people to respond to the debate, and those logs were deemed off limits while posts here were being shoved in everyone's face as clear evidence that we were violating the rules. The whole place is about as corrupt as a corrupt website can get.