[the_logos]

I think you're right. It shouldn't be looked at as bad (whoever pointed out that Olympic athletes are fine with being termed amateurs was a good one) but clearly some people take issue with the hobbyist or amateur label and if that's the case, there's no arguing with it.

Thanks for recognizing that. It's exactly the same as the potential misunderstanding over professional/hobbyist.



Sounds like a good idea. Nobody's checking what people claim in the current descriptive fields for MUDs either. I know I'd fill this kind of field out but does it really matter much if some MUD owners don't? I don't think so myself.

--matt