|
It struck me as amusing the way my review on SWSE was replied to by the MUD owner (within 4 hours too, get a life) as a review.
The reviews are reviews. If someone submits a bad review, it's still a review. It's not an opening for the owner and regulars to jump in and state contrary opinions to the original review.
As long as the review isn't outright curse-filled flaming, it's still a valid opinion. Especially when someone bothers to go to a MUD and post the review non-anonymously. When the owner or another regular comes along to make counter-points to a review, it's no longer a review, it's a debate, and what the blazes is the point of that? If there were any valid counterpoints, they should have been made on the MUD, in gameplay and immortal behavior.
I'd suggest removing the nonsense reviews. If someone says a MUD is bad, that's his opinion, which is the whole point of the review system.
|