Top Mud Sites Forum Return to TopMudSites.com
Go Back   Top Mud Sites Forum > MUD Promotions and Events > MUD Announcements
Click here to Register

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-02-2003, 06:39 AM   #81
KaVir
Legend
 
KaVir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Name: Richard
Home MUD: God Wars II
Posts: 2,052
KaVir will become famous soon enoughKaVir will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stilton wrote:
If you'd bother to look at the thread, you'd find that your ad hominem here is, as usual, false. †I have not misquoted anyone.
The_Logos stated "Certainly there are other mud engines available. However, there are not, to my knowledge at least, other available mud engines available that have proved themselves to nearly the same extent in a commerical environment"

Which you then reinterpreted as "I'm quite aware of many good bases to work from for a hobbyist. †As logos noted, none of these have a proven track record of years in a commercial environment supporting several hundred simultaneous users."

My response was appropriate to your version of what he'd said, but rather irrelevent considering what he actually said. †That was the point I was trying to illustrate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by
Commercial license terms are also either unavailable or hard to compare to the engines/codebases you cite. †As I understand it, DIKU II for example is a codebase, while Rapture is a language and compiler/interpreter with native socket support.
Diku II (aka VME) includes a fully embedded scripting system called DIL. †I have no idea how powerful it is, but I do know that it covers the creation of things like skills and spells, in addition to the usual OLC-style functionality. †Pricing is $99.95 for a non-commercial license, or $899.00 for a business license. †No royalties, although you have to pay for upgrades (if you want them) after the first year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by
DGD/LP would be an interesting comparison if you have a pointer to license terms?
I've no idea, sorry. †You'd have to contact Skotos Tech I guess, as they appear to hold the exclusive rights to it now. †I know they posted a draft non-commercial license here, which might give you a rough idea of what to expect: http://www.kanga.nu/archives/MUD-Dev...4/msg00703.php

You've already answered your own questions about Cold in a later post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by
regardless of development tools, it will still require a large amount of time and effort in order to produce a decent game.

Unless you're suggesting that Rapture would require more time and effort to develop content for than another engine/codebase, I'm not sure how this is relevant.
You responded to my comments about the cost by asking how long it would take a company to develop an engine themselves. †The relevence of my above point was that I don't NEED much information about the engine to know that it will still take a huge amount of time to develop the mud. †Getting an engine is certainly a headstart, but shouldn't be compared with the development of an entire game (as you implied by asking about the progress of my own project).

Quote:
Originally Posted by
malaclypse wrote:
Returning to the topic, I'd just like to say that our development process continues to speed along with Rapture. In fact, while our detractors have been busy disseminating misinformation, Persistent Realms has already coded rooms, movement, communication channels, emotes, rudimentary OLC, object code, and quality assurance systems. As you can see, we already have enough functionality for a pretty advanced talker.
Stilton asked earlier in the thread how long it would take to develop an engine completely from scratch. †Well, it took us around five weeks to attain the above level of talker functionality (ie create a character, walk around rooms, talk to people, etc) under similar conditions (two programmers in their spare time).

And yes, I'm sure that your engine provides lots of other nice functionality as well. †But the point I'm trying to stress is that the engine is a pretty small part of the overall mud.

One last point: I have no problem with people running commercial muds. †My interest here lies purely with the licensing issues of the Rapture engine (which was after all the original subject of the thread). †And if people don't want such issues discussed, posting them to a discussion forum is really not the best thing to do.
KaVir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2003, 10:19 AM   #82
Hardestadt
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 84
Hardestadt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by (KaVir @ Oct. 02 2003,15:39)
Stilton asked earlier in the thread how long it would take to develop an engine completely from scratch. Well, it took us around five weeks to attain the above level of talker functionality (ie create a character, walk around rooms, talk to people, etc) under similar conditions (two programmers in their spare time).
As CTO of Persistent Realms, we got that accomplished in a week and a half of my spare time. I'm the only coder who is contributing in the initial stage.

I'd have to say that working with Iron Realms has been an absolute pleasure. We have a fantastic level of contact with the guy who wrote the engine who has been able to clarify any issues we've had the few times we've had problems, and coding for the engine has been by far the easiest and quickest process for any mud I've worked with.

For the record: Working with the Rapture Engine has been an absolute pleasure.

- Leigh

Persistent Realms LLC
Hardestadt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2003, 01:56 PM   #83
Stilton
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 100
Stilton is on a distinguished road
KaVir:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
My response was appropriate to your version of what he'd said, but rather irrelevent considering what he actually said. †That was the point I was trying to illustrate.
Yes, topic drift. †Since we don't have the data to quantify the success of companies like Skotos relative to Iron Realms, it was more interesting to me to find out to what extent other businesses had survived on licensing vs writing their own without quibbling over the level of success. †I just didn't think that I deserved the gratuitous insult.

Quote:
Originally Posted by
Diku II (aka VME) includes a fully embedded scripting system called DIL.
But VME still isn't quite like Rapture, is it? †Quite a bit beyond sockets is hard coded?

Quote:
Originally Posted by
The relevence of my above point was that I don't NEED much information about the engine to know that it will still take a huge amount of time to develop the mud.
True, but if you've got 5 tasks to do, saying that it will take a long time to get them all done doesn't prove anything about whether it's better to do task 1 yourself or sub it out.

I agree that coding is only a small part of the job.

Quote:
Originally Posted by
But the point I'm trying to stress is that the engine is a pretty small part of the overall mud.
True, but $10,000 is also a pretty small amount of money when considered as part of startup costs for most businesses.

Quote:
Originally Posted by
Well, it took us around five weeks to attain the above level of talker functionality (ie create a character, walk around rooms, talk to people, etc) under similar conditions (two programmers in their spare time).
Many businesses would consider $10,000 pretty cheap to move your opening date closer by a month, and the royalties a cheap way of getting continuing bugfixes/development taken care of.

I wish them luck- any successful venture, hobbyist or commercial, can only help attract people to the community.

Stilton
Stilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2003, 04:42 PM   #84
visko
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 98
visko is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to visko Send a message via AIM to visko
Um...

Questions come to mind at this point.

Have any of the major players in the current arguments published philosophical or business-oriented papers regarding these matters? I'd be interested in collecting a bunch of links to pages all over the web where people can read full, unadulterated points without having pieces of them picked apart in an ongoing debate (one of the problems with the debate model, imho).

Also...there DOES seem to be a bit of a gap in the entire debate so far...

People who build commercial games want money. This is why they're "commercial" games. Because they want money, the implement parts of the game that use RL money as a means of advancement.

On the other hand, a game that is inherently unbalanced or creates major problems with the structures that use RL money will not be played. Games in general that are unbalanced and allow for social, material, or any other category of trend that players don't like will not be played. So it's in the creator's best interest to create a game that is balanced overall. The argument that "paying for MUDs is a bad thing"....most of you probably don't run out and wait at the door for HL2, nor do you pay for any of the other (in my opinion) limited FPS games on the market right now. But ask yourself: why does anyone?

Also: players who play commercial MUDs have more invested in a game than time. Time is an interesting commodity; those who have a lot of it rarely value it at all, and those with none of it eventually end up wanting it more than money. Money is an entirely different beast. For some ridiculous reason, everyone wants it, and all they can get, regardless of how much they have currently. But SPENDING money is where it really gets interesting; when you spend money, you expect results. Whether its the thrill you payed for at Six Flags, the screw you paid for doing its job, or the credits you buy in Achaea holding their worth and still be useful in 6 years (because Achaea is still around in 6 years, a rare thing for a MUD nowadays), you EXPECT results. So you do more to make sure you get the results you want.

Logos and his administrators keep the obviously destructive influences away from their normal pbase, and in turn the normal pbase keeps itself pretty happy by being a (relatively) mature group and finding excitement in their gameplay. How is this different from CS, UT2003, Warcraft, or any other game you pay for? Is it because it's not a one-time payment and then thousands of hours of fun? (Because it would seem that this could be the model you choose for Achaea....) Is it paying for the games at all? Is it the notion that time is worth more than money, or money is worth more than time? (Because both seem to be useful and allow for the acquisition of power on Achaea, maybe not equally, but that was never a debate as of yet)...

Instead of bickering, I would strongly encourage those of you out there who have a serious and vehement opinion out there to go publish your feelings and make points (even without valid references -- Kavir, we're not all engineers. You're allowed to have a gut feeling every once in a while...I think you actually did earlier in the discussion with regards to the feasibility of making a MUD profitable in 6 years) that we can all view. I'll volunteer to create the website and order the points of view in as objective and comprehensive a way as I can manage, and we'll be done with the #### thing.

Meanwhile, congrats to Iron Realms for being a business that didn't tank in the current economic setting. Hope we eventually see some OSS from you sometime soon so we can start increasing the overall quality of MUDs again.

-Visko
visko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2003, 12:27 PM   #85
Cyllan
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Cyllan is on a distinguished road
Well, as an achaean player I want to ad my two cents to this.

First of all, politics in Achaea is not all about the power or the good fighter your character is. I've never bought credits and I am more mighty than quite a lot of characters who are in political positions on my city. I know some people who never have bought any credits OOC and still have higher than average stats (by buying credits IC). Is only about the time you have for playing.

Saying that buying credits OOC is cheating is like saying that you cheat when an older player helps you by giving you information, or when you have been 3 years playing, can play even blind because you know the game and you start another character, wich will be much better than the first character of an absolute newbie to mudding.

As an admin I've had to deal with quite a lot of players far worse than the ones I find in Achaea, specially people who can stay for 10 hours a day in a mud, get to the maximun level of experience and then dedicate his time to make life difficult for newbies. And they don't need money to do so. At least in Achaea when a player is not acting well you can be sure his city and his guild will take care of him. The fact is, credits allow for some nice and fast character advancement, but if you're not good at RP you will get nothing more than faster bashing and better PKing (that if is not RP means serious problems for you). And you cannot buy good RP with credits.

As a relatively new player to achaea, my biggest problem is not with people who has bought credits, but with the big older people who is in power (city, guild, order governments) and know the game better than I do so they will stay there forever and will have the power to tell me what can I do or not and make laws and so. But it happens in free muds too, when you have the good old Heroes (max level players) who got the limited objects the day they appeared first. And I am not so mad as to complain about this, just because in a while I will look like them to the next round of newbies.

Anyway, and returning to the subject... You get the Rapture compiled and working, you get the code, where can I check the terms? I feel curious. If the code stands the same for all the muds running under Rapture and it becomes an standard with no public code it can cause we have a lot of achaeas with a different skin. And if I was the guy who programmed it I would not let my code free around so people could copy it for free. So... How does this licensing thing work exactly?
Cyllan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2003, 06:27 PM   #86
Iluvatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mississippi USA
Posts: 142
Iluvatar is on a distinguished road
Iím just an ignorant yet often accused too vocal an old man and Iíve read this nine pages of combined rant, whine, intelligent rebuttal and scathing innuendo and Iím frankly amazed intelligent people miss the point so often. I firmly believe we are two different disciplines, hobbyist and entrepreneur and while I believe those who run graphical or text MU*s for personal profit are exploiting the children of today, but I actually applaud them for success at it since somebody has to. Iím even more impressed they stoop to share the plethora of administrative, qualitative and historical knowledge theyíve garnered over all the years with we, the deprived hobbyists.

Let me elaborate a tad before I ruffle too many feathers. I mean deprived in the perspective that we donít work from analyst driven models of money making ideas, paid coders nor elaborate degrees and training in interpersonal social skills. Iím not saying all of you do, but you should and I applaud those with the vision to take advantage and make money, but you transgressed the hobbyist stage IMHO. Our, the hobbyist focus is perhaps a bit different in that we have a vision of a world and whether by kink, twist or persistence, hope to make that vision a place that attracts players who also enjoy our vision. Thatís part of the challenge to us. Would I want someone to pay us/me to share that vision? #### YES! Do I care if they do? Nopes, as a hobbyist my over 30k hours in seven years online building and managing has the reward of seeing happy people, amazed at certain things, whining about others, but typically enjoying themselves. In my experience, even those that dabble in the realms of Everquest and Aechea eventually return home to our Phoenix after a while because itís ĎHOME.í

Molly tried to explain but sadly she didnít really articulate her issues well because of perhaps two different frames of reference, exploitive versus nurturing. I do share her views in most respects but I hope Iím articulating them somewhat better. Players play out of a sense of wonder at abilities given the medium, visualization or dream of reality substitution, or the illusion of another world where you can be that knight in shining armor or hero of the realm that real life circumstance has relegated most to only dream of. In a Mu*, weíre all equal to begin with, none of the social inequities that determine ďwhich side of the tracksĒ you belong on, regardless of country of origin, upbringing or any of the other social stigmas applied. ANY application of affluence in real life taints that persona to a great extent. Iíve heard and believe there are ďtimeĒ payment ways to compensate for lack of affluence in quite a few places, but isnít time more valuable to reach the same goal and not equal to coins, the modern shortcut to notoriety? I wouldnít really consider that a concern of entrepreneurs since the dollar is the bottom line goal, but it exists and something the valued hobbyists I know concern themselves with. Iíve often kicked someone offline cause they needed to get their buns to school. Silly of me, I know, but they are my kids and Iím not a Nintendo or Playstation game since I care.

Idealistic, altruistic too much, perhaps, but we are successful in our limited perspective and definition of Ďsuccessfulí as are Molly and KaVir and Brody and Ntanel and Samson and quite a few others. Iím perhaps a bit jealous that I canít earn money for something I love to do, but oh well, Iím happy with the other rewards and I get graduation announcements as well as personal notes from our players like we are all members of a family.

All obeisance and attaboys to Logos et al, Iím proud of you and jealous. I hope Rapture rewards you well and maybe perhaps you can contribute some of that amazing profit back to the rest of us to promote the hobby.
Iluvatar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Rapture license - Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The DIKU license the_logos Tavern of the Blue Hand 242 05-06-2006 01:28 PM
Rapture 2.1 beta test the_logos MUD Announcements 5 11-03-2004 03:25 PM
New Rapture mud: Ilyrias, the Aegadian Isles malaclypse Advertising for Players 5 06-07-2004 09:15 AM
New Rapture MUD seeks writers/builders malaclypse Advertising for Staff 0 11-11-2003 11:50 PM
Illegal license? Dulan Legal Issues 33 05-27-2002 04:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Style based on a design by Essilor
Copyright Top Mud Sites.com 2014