|
|||||||
This is a discussion on "this one's about leaving muds" in the Top Mud Sites Tavern of the Blue Hand forum : A few comments on your post, Cerise.... I know stuff like this happens. It has happened to me _many_ times in fact. However, that is one of the reasons for me designing my current MUD. In the end, it will be completely without staff - it will not need it. Staffed MUDs tend towards favoritism and, well, unfair/biased administration. However, RoD is one of the biggest MUDs. If someone was banned completely without reason, then heads _would_ roll, I know as fact. Seth, as KaVir has said, is only saying his side of the story - the opposite side has had ... |
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our MUD community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you are a registered member of the old TMS forums, please click here
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 |
|
Senior Member
|
A few comments on your post, Cerise....
I know stuff like this happens. It has happened to me _many_ times in fact. However, that is one of the reasons for me designing my current MUD. In the end, it will be completely without staff - it will not need it. Staffed MUDs tend towards favoritism and, well, unfair/biased administration. However, RoD is one of the biggest MUDs. If someone was banned completely without reason, then heads _would_ roll, I know as fact. Seth, as KaVir has said, is only saying his side of the story - the opposite side has had no chance to tell their story. Honestly, if Seth pulled the same crap he has detailed - questioning immortal judgements, taunting the immortals, etc. - on a MUD I ran, I'd likely kick him off as well. According to his own words, he was trying to undermine the immortal's authority _publicly_. From an imm point of view, that ONLY causes harm to the MUD, and brings no benefit whatsoever. By not taking it higher, and promptly taking it to public channels, in his OWN statement, it proves that he only had bad intentions. You people may not like what I have to say, but honestly, that's what I see it as. I've been on the short-end of the stick many, many times - my most recent, The Sea of Storms, for "melodrama". A RP-enforced MUD. Banning for "melodrama". _That_ is the short-end of the stick. What Seth claims...-shrug- -D |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Senior Member
|
please Dulan..can you at least try not to post negative posts about muds w/o proving them ?
Quote:
It looks like I know you're bad cuz you're actually very bad.In one word : Childish And,about Seth..Im also ready to help..Anytime.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Senior Member
|
Cerise, I would really like to thank you for your support concerning this all. It feels both good and bad knowing that I'm not the only one who was vistimized by power-abusive immortals and their little "cliques" of friends. Thank you
And Dulan, once again, I did NOT harass anyone to start with. It all started with me openly questioning an immortal's deciscion in a normal way. That is what made Moonbeam and her little sidekick Kali hate me. That is what started the serious crap, besides the odd little puddle of corruptness I occasionally found myself in. Read one of my earlier posts, it's all in there somewhere. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 126
![]() |
Oh puh-lease.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Note: I'm starting to hate ikonboard. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Senior Member
|
Sadly enough, that applies to you quite well, Seth.
May want to pay attention to what you post, as it could reflect back on you (amusingly). -D |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Senior Member
|
College? -glances at the calender- Interesting. You go to -insert obviously racist statement here- U?
Now, onto a more serious post. Seth, you are insulting people over their honest opinions, simply because their opinions do not fit with your schema of the world (Pay attention to that word, anyone who has any interest in Psych. Unlike Seth's wannabe-psych babble, or the "issues" idiocy, that is a real term, and probably a good diagnosis of "why" Seth is so vindictive here.). Anyone who does not fit with said schema, you attack viciously regardless of what was stated in their opinion. As I said in a much longer post, something had to come from you in order to irritate them. However, in your schema of RoD, you never did anything, and you were perfectly innocent. Even the most corrupt imm must have a reason in order to act. According to you, their reason was you questioning an immortal's decision on a public channel, without taking it to a higher up first. That would righteously **** me off if you pulled it on my MUD. Questioning immortal decisions on a public channel without taking it to a higher-up undermines the staffs authority. Only a fool would tolerate that in a player that plays their place for free. -D |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
The lessons to draw out of this are: 1. Don't question an imm's decision within 48 hours, no matter how questionnable it seems to you. 2. If you really feel you have to question an imm's decision, you should do it by mail, and try not to sound attacking (use formulas like "in retrospect, I felt your decision was a bit harsh" above "you were too rash in dealing with blah") 3. Never, ever take it to public channels, be it comms or the in-game newsboards. 4. Realize that no matter how discontent you are with the administration, it is their game. It is their voice which decides how the place is run. A MUD is never a democracy, so you'll be on the losing end no matter what. 5. There's no point in arguing that the players "make the game" as much as the staff, no matter how true it is. From their point of view, if you have a problem with the way the place is run, you're not their target audience. Your only right is to disconnect, and trust me, it's easier to do out of your free will when you're discontent than to cope with a ban. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
As for the pseado-psychological crap you spray around, I talked about it earlier. I don't feel like wasting precious time over THAT again. And about my college, it's called "Technisch College Ede" and it's a dutch one, yes. I suggest you first try to pronounce it properly before trying to make fun of it, my dearest repetetive friend. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Senior Member
|
Psuedo-? It's real, Seth. I'm a Psych major, among other things. While by no means am I qualified to be a doctor, I can fairly accurately figure out what is going around in most people's heads. You, my friend, are an extremely easy one to figure out. We do not fit in your schema, and thus, you attack if we try to contradict it.
People, as a whole, are not sheep. Learn that, Ingham, and know it. If you expect them to fit your mental picture, they won't. And you will be attacked for trying to fit them in. As for your post: You took something publicly which should not have been taken publicly. I agree with the decision to punish you, albeit not in that manner. I would have merely deleted your character for a first offense, then banned on second. Of course, considering the story that you posted, there was far more than a first and second offense. And since it is obviously biased towards your view of the world.... -D |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Senior Member
|
Alastair, you are so right it hurts.
Even tho if I did do everything you said, I still would have gotten in a mess with abusive immortals sooner or later anyways, but that's not the issue... Thank you for summing up the things I need to remember when (or , more likely, IF) I ever visit a MUD again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Senior Member
|
Once again, you lash out as I violate your schema's.
Ingham, you somehow read, but do not comprehend what I state. I do not know many that have that dubious distinction, but hey, whatever floats your boat. -D |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Senior Member
|
No, you'll be branded as a spammer forever, bud. You just won't get flamed over spam anymore. Pretty simple concept.
As for the rest - I'm not attacking you over spam. I'm attacking you over acting like a self-righteous asshole who cannot possibly see that a MUD may have been right to remove him from it. Simple enough for you, neh? -D |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Ever thought about a career in politics? I hear they could use more close-minded people with an IQ not higher then their age like you and Bush. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Senior Member
|
Interesting. And now you jump to insults of my intelligence. Unfortunately, I know a rough estimate of my IQ - And, unless you believe in the Bible, no human has lived that long, Sethie-poo. If I was that old, I'd be a medical curiousity. But, bitter? Not really. Irritated is closer. I get ****y when irritated - and you have managed to irritate the **** right out of me. I'd make a remark about sphincters, but you'd then go off about gayness, as I expect your next remarks to hover around as you've turned to the juvenile, but classic, 'IQ' insults that so many newbs-wannabes fall back on when they cannot think up a good response, but are too young to realize that they should concede the point. Now, it is very simple. RoD may have been right to ban you. Now that your support group is beginning to realize that, you turn on the people that say that RoD could |