Kavir,
Heya. You consistently seem to misunderstand me, and perhaps that's largely my fault. My points are all over the place at times. I am not saying a violation has not occured, I am saying the violation may well be unenforceable.
These are aspects of the situation I feel you have yet to address.
Whether we like it or not, there are other considerations over time than just the Diku team's license. Mud's very specifically are a strange amalgum between normal literature and programming, such that I doubt, for example, that the world design could be coopted by the Diku team as a derivitive work should the mud be moved to another code base.
It just seems your view on this is narrower than what evidence I can find just fishing around the internet would seem to indicate.
|